 |
 |
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:18 PM. |
| Official UlaunchELF Forums Discussion for the most unofficial build of launchELF! |

10-04-2008, 07:59 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 84
|
|
|
Skins
I saw the great thread going on about the FMCB installer skin and thought about giving uLaunchELF a facelift on my MC... So I came up with these two... One for the start and one for gui... I know it is nothing new nor innovative, just wanted to share...
|

10-04-2008, 08:09 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 84
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCDes
I saw the great thread going on about the FMCB installer skin and thought about giving uLaunchELF a facelift on my MC... So I came up with these two... One for the start and one for gui... I know it is nothing new nor innovative, just wanted to share...
|
I'm sure a mod would get around to telling you, but this should probably go here: http://psx-scene.com/forums/official...d-v3-52-a.html
__________________
To err is human. To really foul up requires a computer.
|

10-04-2008, 08:10 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 84
|
|
|
You're absolutely right... I missed that one... Could a mod please move this to the correct section please... I completely posted in the wrong place...
|

10-04-2008, 03:03 PM
|
|
Contributor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,733
|
|
@JCDes:
I wouldn't mind moving them into the regular skin thread, except for one thing that makes me want to keep them separate while we discuss it, and that is the legal position.
You are using registered Sony trademarks and logotypes in those images, in a context we know that Sony disapproves of, which probably makes the whole thing illegal. From a legal standpoint it would be better to play around with the logos a bit, so they no longer match exactly what Sony has registered. Simple things like changing "Sony" to "Sonny"/"Zony" and adding some indent line to the Playstation symbol should make a big difference legality-wise.
I'm leaving the pictures intact for the moment, but I expect you to either remove them or update them to legal versions shortly. Unless you can convince me that they really are legal as-is of course (but that will take some doing  ).
Best regards: dlanor
|

10-04-2008, 05:11 PM
|
 |
Guest User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NTSC
Posts: 1,279
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlanor
Unless you can convince me that they really are legal as-is of course (but that will take some doing  ).
Best regards: dlanor
|
It shouldnt be any type of legal issue as he isnt infringing upon the trademarks, but only displaying an image of a Sony product, which is perfectly legal.
The image of Sony Memory Card is not a trademark. The trademarks are on the MC, but thats where they are supposed to be.
__________________
PS2 Skins Gallery
PS2 Consoles:
V4 - unmodded (2)
V5 DMS4 Pro SE
V9 CC 2.0 SLE
V16 Silver - unmodded

Last edited by JNABK; 10-04-2008 at 06:15 PM.
|

10-04-2008, 06:04 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 84
|
|
Nothing illegal there buddy... And I do not see you complaining about the ones already in that thread when they show controllers and consoles.... Justice for all my friend not just to some...
Here's an example of one of them (found it by just reading the thread from the beginning)... Using "PS2" logo at the top left corner that logo was placed there... Post #5 the very first picture...
http://psx-scene.com/forums/317733-post5.html
In my case like JNABK said I'm using pictures of products not logos or any copyrighted material... Practically I'm giving them a free ad...
As for this....
Quote:
|
Unless you can convince me that they really are legal as-is of course (but that will take some doing ).
|
No doing at all actually piece of cake... I did not put the logo there, sony did...
Last edited by JCDes; 10-04-2008 at 06:38 PM.
|

10-04-2008, 06:09 PM
|
 |
Guest User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NTSC
Posts: 1,279
|
|
I just did a little research and found its not any type of infringement of the trademarks since they arent used for the purpose of selling something:
Quote:
What is a trademark?
A trademark includes any word, name, symbol, or device, or any combination, used, or intended to be used, in commerce to identify and distinguish the goods of one manufacturer or seller from goods manufactured or sold by others, and to indicate the source of the goods. In short, a trademark is a brand name.
Source of info
|
According to this, its not illegal or even an issue to use trademarks in skins or webpages. So basically, every time someone uses a trademark in their skins, web site or forums, its an advertisement to the company that trademarked it ......think they will be upset by that?
__________________
PS2 Skins Gallery
PS2 Consoles:
V4 - unmodded (2)
V5 DMS4 Pro SE
V9 CC 2.0 SLE
V16 Silver - unmodded

Last edited by JNABK; 10-04-2008 at 06:33 PM.
Reason: added info source
|

10-04-2008, 06:39 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 84
|
|
|
Cool!!! We're all legal... LOL..
|

10-04-2008, 11:00 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 23
|
|
|
I like them barely llegal... ^_^
|

10-04-2008, 11:07 PM
|
 |
Guest User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NTSC
Posts: 1,279
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ichigo
I like them barely llegal... ^_^
|
Dont we all? 
__________________
PS2 Skins Gallery
PS2 Consoles:
V4 - unmodded (2)
V5 DMS4 Pro SE
V9 CC 2.0 SLE
V16 Silver - unmodded

|

10-05-2008, 02:38 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 84
|
|
|
Lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|

10-05-2008, 05:45 PM
|
|
Contributor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,733
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JNABK
It shouldnt be any type of legal issue as he isnt infringing upon the trademarks, but only displaying an image of a Sony product, which is perfectly legal.
The image of Sony Memory Card is not a trademark. The trademarks are on the MC, but thats where they are supposed to be.
|
Good point.
I suppose this is one of those cases where an exact copy is more legal than an edited one, because if the picture of such a product is otherwise modified (thus no longer an illustration of the real product) the logos immediately become illegal to have in those pictures.
Still, as long as they are legal in the current form, I have no objection.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCDes
Nothing illegal there buddy... And I do not see you complaining about the ones already in that thread when they show controllers and consoles.... Justice for all my friend not just to some...
|
And I've been thinking about those other skins too, in regard to legality. I just haven't come around to bringing it up in any posts yet.
Quote:
|
In my case like JNABK said I'm using pictures of products not logos or any copyrighted material... Practically I'm giving them a free ad...
|
Agreed, but it's a fine line to tread.
If any change is made to the illustration of the product carrying the logo, then it becomes illegal to keep that logo, unless that too is changed somehow. And it is always illegal for us to use a sony trademark or logo in any other context than as part of such a picture.
Quote:
|
No doing at all actually piece of cake... I did not put the logo there, sony did...
|
True. And as long as we only use the logo that way, it should be OK.
Edit:
On second thought, I'm still not really sure if those pictures are strictly legal. In one of them the string "Powered by FreeMcBoot" has been edited into the picture to make it appear to be integral to the memory card. And in the other picture the same thing has been done with the string "uLaunchelf". I agree that this editing is decorative (though I prefer the casing "uLaunchELF"), but that is not the point.
The point is that editing the part of the picture that shows the memory card, so that it no longer shows how real memory cards look, but imaginary ones embossed with our project titles, could be construed as illegally associating the Sony logos with our projects.
If ours had been commercial projects a lawsuit would have been inevitable...
I'll leave the pictures intact, pending further discussion, but I don't consider the case closed.
Btw: It's not that I want to block these or any other skins myself. I like them. But I also like keeping these projects legal, and to me that has a higher priority. If you can convince me that this usage is legal, I will drop my objections. But like I said earlier, convincing me will take some doing...
And once we reach a final conclusion on this issue, the 'verdict' (either way) will be applied to all posted skins. Hopefully they can all stay, as that is what I want too, but only if that really is legal.
Best regards: dlanor
|

10-05-2008, 07:41 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 84
|
|
Quote:
|
On second thought, I'm still not really sure if those pictures are strictly legal. In one of them the string "Powered by FreeMcBoot" has been edited into the picture to make it appear to be integral to the memory card.
|
Nice argument but is missing one fundamental base:
That specific area of the memory card is dedicated so the user can label it to identify the contents... I guess it could even say "Powered by JeT Fuel"...
Also I gave the font a much lighter and brighter color and a bevel in darker shade so it would look as a sticker that was placed there and the proper skew just so it would match the angle the MC picture is at but not completely... If I wanted it to look like part of it I would have given it the exact same color as the PS logo, font and no bevel... It is a matter of visual appreciation... But believe me If I would have wanted it to look like it was born there I would have done it but that was not the intention...
|

10-05-2008, 07:57 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 84
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCDes
Nice argument but is missing one fundamental base:
That specific area of the memory card is dedicated so the user can label it to identify the contents... I guess it could even say "Powered by JeT Fuel"...
Also I gave the font a much lighter and brighter color and a bevel in darker shade so it would look as a sticker that was placed there and the proper skew just so it would match the angle the MC picture is at but not completely... If I wanted it to look like part of it I would have given it the exact same color as the PS logo, font and no bevel... It is a matter of visual appreciation... But believe me If I would have wanted it to look like it was born there I would have done it but that was not the intention...
|
That is a VERY good point to me. After all, wouldn't it be legal to include an actual picture of a memory card with a label saying anything you want there? If so, what's the difference in "photoshoping" it in?
__________________
To err is human. To really foul up requires a computer.
|

10-06-2008, 03:17 AM
|
 |
Guest User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NTSC
Posts: 1,279
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlanor
I suppose this is one of those cases where an exact copy is more legal than an edited one, because if the picture of such a product is otherwise modified (thus no longer an illustration of the real product) the logos immediately become illegal to have in those pictures.
|
It makes no difference if you use an exact copy of the product or you alter it to your own personal taste. You are allowed to modify any product you purchase any way you see fit. {Selling it is a whole different story.}
So to display an image of a product you might wish to buy or did buy, you can display it freely to show others your modifications. {like the modified case covers for the consoles, they are not illegal to sell unless they have a Sony trademark on them and arent sanctioned by Sony to use any trademarks}
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlanor
If any change is made to the illustration of the product carrying the logo, then it becomes illegal to keep that logo, unless that too is changed somehow. And it is always illegal for us to use a sony trademark or logo in any other context than as part of such a picture.
|
No that is not the legal issues of trademark infringement, you can edit a trademark, use a trademark or do anything with that trademark as long as it is not for the purpose of selling a product. It would only be free advertisement to the company owning the trademarks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlanor
Edit:
On second thought, I'm still not really sure if those pictures are strictly legal. In one of them the string "Powered by FreeMcBoot" has been edited into the picture to make it appear to be integral to the memory card. And in the other picture the same thing has been done with the string "uLaunchelf".
|
That indentation on the MC is designed there for users to place a label to mark the MC as different from others they might have, so by putting anything in that area is perfectly legal. You can alter the image of the MC any way you want, and its still not anything illegal. If you want to color the MC purple and add stripes down the middle, right thru the "playstation 2", you can without any legal reprocussions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlanor
The point is that editing the part of the picture that shows the memory card, so that it no longer shows how real memory cards look, but imaginary ones embossed with our project titles, could be construed as illegally associating the Sony logos with our projects.
|
A trademark is a company 'branding' stamp to identify it in the market place of commerce. The idea is for a company to have such a good reputation that their 'trademark' becomes a common reputation as a good product to buy, so by using a trademark to sell your product, you can cut some costs in advertising. Using a trademark belonging to another company to sell your own product is where trademark infringement laws come into play.
By associating any Sony trademarks into a homebrew project {as long as it remains a free product} would only be viewed as a boost to Sony, perhaps even making a few more sales for them on a console, MC, etc. (im sure they secretly would say its good free advertisement for the console). If the free homebrew project is that good, it only adds to the reputation of the trademark, thus a 'plus' benefit to the company.
As long as your not attempting to take away their marketshare as a competitor using their trademarks, they wont bother about a trademark suit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlanor
If ours had been commercial projects a lawsuit would have been inevitable...
|
No, first a "cease and desist" order would have been issued by their attorney. They MUST first attempt to ask you to stop using their trademark. Only if it was ignored would a suit be the next course of action for them to persue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlanor
If you can convince me that this usage is legal, I will drop my objections. But like I said earlier, convincing me will take some doing... 
|
Well i hope i have convinced you enough to ease your mind....believe me, we arent doing anything illegal with the trademarks or logos.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlanor
And once we reach a final conclusion on this issue, the 'verdict' (either way) will be applied to all posted skins. Hopefully they can all stay, as that is what I want too, but only if that really is legal.
Best regards: dlanor
|
Really, it is perfectly legal as long as Free McBoot, uLaunchELF or any other homebrew app using any such skins with a 'trademark' image is NOT for sale or placed into the commercial market place, theres nothing to be concerned about.
A trademark is not the same as a copyright. I would be more concerned with the use of copyrighted images used than trademark images. But again, as long as there is not money to be made, many copyright holders of images that may be used in such skins wouldnt even bother, since its not in a context of 'competition' in the purpose they intended their images. Of course their maybe some who dont like to see their 'art' used in any other manner than what they created, so again, a cease and desist order would be the first contact and the image simply removed as the proper way to avoid any further issues with whomever should make such a claim.
__________________
PS2 Skins Gallery
PS2 Consoles:
V4 - unmodded (2)
V5 DMS4 Pro SE
V9 CC 2.0 SLE
V16 Silver - unmodded

Last edited by JNABK; 10-06-2008 at 03:33 AM.
|

10-06-2008, 03:26 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 818
|
|
I still don't understand how something like this, which is not making any money can be considered illegal? I have been searching around online, but still haven't found any solid proof to suggest how this is illegal or legal. The PS2 font I used in my uLE skin can be re-created using the MINIMALHARD font, or what about the Zrnic font? Both are from www.dafont.com, which is a free font site. If you made your own t-shirt and put your own Nike logo on it, but didn't sell it and just wore it or gave it to your friend, do you think that would also be illegal? Maybe it could be if you were giving them away for free online and that was somehow taking away from their profits?
EDIT: I think what JNABK said makes sense. I don't see why any company would care as long as you're not taking sales away from them in some way. I really don't see how any of this is affecting Sony at all. What grounds would they have to sue? I just don't get it...
__________________
Hardware: PS2 v7 (GH-022) NTSC | Crystal Chip 2.0 Pro SLE | Sony Network Adapter | 300GB Segate HDD
Software: uLaunchELF 4.28 | HDLoader 0.8c | HDL_Dump 0.8.6+GUI | SMS 2.8 (Rev.5)
My Projects: uLaunchELF - skins/template | skin template readme | documentation (contributor)
Last edited by ps2dragon; 10-06-2008 at 03:55 AM.
|

10-06-2008, 03:39 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Campinas - SP - Brazil
Posts: 222
|
|
C'mon peeps! This is an "artists thread" or a "lawyers thread"?
Keep the skins coming and let discuss about their legallity when there are no more to come!  | |