Uh I didn't state a thing apart from my last post. Just correcting misinformation in here, thats all.
|
|
|
|
Would you like to get all the new info from
PSX-Scene in your email each day?
Want to learn more about the team keeping you up to date with the latest scene news?
Read about them now! Check out our Developer bios, too! | ||
|
|
Uh I didn't state a thing apart from my last post. Just correcting misinformation in here, thats all.
if u said i was misinformed , then u mean i was wrong , practicly statin that it didnt recognize a 200 gig , just lettin u know i wasnt wrongOriginally Posted by EntwinedWS
![]()
Last edited by Streets; 03-22-2005 at 07:39 PM.
As I'm sure this thread will probably end up being closed due to the confusion presented within it, I'll just clarify a few things. You suggested to the original poster to get HDA over HDLoader because of the limitations of the HD space. EntwinedWS and I were merely mentioning the fact that HDLoader and HDA (which are exactly the same program) no longer have these limitations through the use of 48bit patching.Originally Posted by Streets
Okay..final post and as the above poster guessed, then its lockdown time cause this is ridiculous. These are the facts.
HDLoader/HDAdvance (unpatched) will not support bigger than 127 or 137GB (I cant remember exactly which, I THINK 137)
HDLoader patched/HDAdvance Patched/HDadvance 2.0 will recognize any HDD up to 2TB in theory, but I think the biggest anyone has put in so far is 400GB.
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |