This is the basic consensus of what is occurring @ PSX Scene where it was originally posted by the author.
1) He has a self replicating virus on his computer.
2) His intentions are to slander a popular product with ulterior motives. Possibly affiliated with an org.
Regardless of either here is what I posted to his follow up.
Let me present you with some evidence and statistics to prove the unlikeliness of your story. Since 2005, over 81% of consumers are using some sort of antivirus with 67% using some form of anti-spyware. Since that time, Antivirus and Anti-spyware have been merged into a single module we all call Antivirus programs (unless you are still running a SUPER dated program). Now, over half a decade later, I would expect that 81% to be significantly higher.
Let us move on to Exhibit B. I conducted some research about your Trojan.
The study surveyed 1099 U.S. consumers.
Based on the figures for the number of internet users below:
Number using anti-virus software ? 165,097,786.
Number using anti-spyware ? 136,562,366.
I'm assuming this is your scan from Jotti as mentioned in you initial post, since this scan was performed yesterday with identical names: Here.
I was able to match this virus back to 2007 using the hash and size info, on Avira's virus database (I would say, a pretty respectable antivirus program). Here.
If you look at the statistics of this virus - everything claims that it is a low threat. Not to mention under the "Statistics" chart, there has been no occurrences of any statistical importance. Zero to be exact, but I want to give you the benefit of the doubt.
In conclusion, this virus is dated. With over 81+% of our consumer population with a form of antivirus and spyware over half a decade ago. This Trojan can be picked up on ALL antivirus programs as it a VERY BASIC Trojan. With absolutely no surfacing of this virus as of late and your single random occurrence of a virus of little to no threat. It is time for your to ask yourself three questions, (1) why would ANYONE intentionally OR even unwillingly put a Trojan so incapable? (2) It has been over 24+ hours and I've browse all other forums with not as much as a peep? (3) Isn't it time to consider a retract and amend this story as a singled out occurrence, especially with all this proof?
If you choose not to, then I and everyone else here would understand your true intentions.
By the way, need more proof? Shipped on the 12th of Nov with pictures. Ordered on the 5th of Nov. Hope you don't change your story.
from dscartshop.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>
reply-to "dscartshop.com" <email@example.com>
to ************* <***********>
date Thu, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:22 AM
subject Order Update #6**
hide details Nov 12
Order Number: 650
Date Ordered: Friday 05 November, 2010
The comments for your order are: Dear Customer
Thanks for your payments.
We have shipped the goods to you.
The HK post tracking of your package is RB********HK
You could track it at www.hongkongpost.com,after 3-4 business days.
Your order has been updated to the following status:
New status: Shipped
Please reply to this email if you have any questions.
This email address was given to us by you or by one of our customers. If you
feel that you have received this email in error, please send an email to
This e-mail is sent in accordance with the US CAN-SPAM Law in effect
01/01/2004. Removal requests can be sent to this address and will be honored