If sony won this part with their "Evidence" then GeoHot is scrued. Either the Judge is deaf, dumb and blind or in Sonys pocket. It's a parody of a real trail, just the evidence regarding geohot being Geo1Hotz at PSN and everything else is just hearsay where the cut info from various forums and not from the irc itself. Sony believes when info is enclosed in "" it's evidence, they need to find the acctuall person quoting geohot so we know it's not Sony themselves plus we don't even know the accuracy of the quotes or in which context it was, it could have been a joke, so they should have the whole IRC transcript.
This isn't just about geohot, if large cooperations like sony get to have judges in their pocket how safe are the rest of us? I need a doctors note that the Judge is deaf blind and stupid or I will never sleep again.
It's easyer going to jail when you know you are guilty, can't even imagine what I would do to a judge that sends an innocent to jail just to make some money. I would be satisfied with inflicting the maximal amount of pain for the rest of their life and I would make sure it's a long life.
This isn't just about geohot, seeing all the evidence and laughing at them this makes me real scared. Did Sony count on the judges incompetence having the 3.56 Ready for launch or did they really count on the judge herself. Their evidence is a joke and if she takes it seriously it makes her a joke.
It feels like the beginning and end of this story already is written now they only need to make the rest look good. If you ever heard of a russian trail this is one. A russinan trail isn't about guilt or innocence, the person is already guilty before the trail even began however they want to make it look good so they invent wittnesses and evidence to get them there. It's like: geohot+X=Guilty
Now they need to make "X" to look good, the less good "X" looks the dumber the judge will look. However making the "X" look to bad will raise questions how the judge became a judge in the first place.
However letting a person that don't know what internet is rule in a case like this is rather foolish since she don't really understand that Sony is a clown and she takes Sonys evidence seriously, 12 year olds are laughing at Sony but she ruled in their favor, menaing she either in their pocket or totally incompetent, either way we can't feel safe until she is retired because it feels like a toddler is the judge, you smile at her nice and she goes your way no matter the evidence. Did she even look at the evidence or the case? because it seems everyone else is more intrested in the case then her. I wouldn't be suprised if she ruled by tossing a coin because she couldn't been looking at Sonys faked evidence.
This world is going down the toilet, if it's going to burn let it atlest burn to the ground. If geohot looses the next will be the incvisition and they start burning scientist since they most be in bed with the devil. This is to mutch lets hope a jury has more sence however I doubt this will be infront of a jury since we have such a qulified judge, she will make the ruling without alot of incompetent peoples input. Everything on the internet is true and has evidence value, Sony have proved that. lets hope they do this in al cases and soon enough everybody will be in jail. If you don't have any evidence just make them on the internet easy as that......