OK, goodbye REX, officially gone now compliments of Charlie PS2.Originally posted by dust4dust
lol charlie dms3 and my dms3 were paid for full price frm divineo ,u want us to give them away
you the one with the money
Who's asking anyone to 'give away' chips, just cos somethings paid for doesnt mean that gives you the right to post crap about it !
When Messiah was released, you know how 'someone' attained reviews ?
I'll tell you...
By installing in a number of consoles of members democratically elected and voted by members of a forum.
These members then went away with FREE chips and carried out their own tests and findings and reported back individually their own findings.
The chips were installed by someone from Wales UK for free because it was necessary that each chip be installed the same, and also that the installation was of quality and at the risk of the installer who would have replaced any console damaged by installing 'untested beta's'.
The way review of chips SHOULD be done.
However, the argument in this case is a clear matter that Charlie PS2 cahoots with Messiah 2 team. In fact FIY, it was actually the Messiah 2 coder himself who installed and prepared the console with DMS3 as indicated by Charlie referring to his 'famous friend', do we really sit here and wait for Messiah 2 team to come and give glowing reports for other peoples modchips and tell us how they work better than Messiah 2 ???
The argument Rex (my good buddy) put forward (maybe a little loudly), was that in his opinion Charlie PS2 has abused a position, it appears from looking from a distance, that a review of DMS3 was done as fast as possible (before others) and on the basis of comparison with messiah 2, by a messiah 2 'activist', and even with the aid of other Messiah 2 members.
OK, Rex does have reasons for grudge with Messiah 2, but I can assure you that should a sensible review of DMS3 been brought forward using sensible versions of consoles, and also not continually matched against Messiah 2, then Rex would have said nothing.
Who says Messiah 2 is the basis for comparison ?, functionality and performance itself is logically the only comparison required, and doesnt have to be deemed 'worse' or 'unlike' messiah 2, otherwise whenever we see mentions of DMS3, we may as well say things like macro-off (unlike messiah 2, green screen (unlike Messiah 2), DVD Multiregion (unlike Messiah 2) and so on, but we wouldnt say these sort of things.
However, the best thing to do now is to look for the findings from others and then go back to Charlie PS2's version and see what is the opinion, this NEEDS a review from people who cannot have any obvious reasons for giving a 'I'm disappointed' view, to backup my case, take a look on Isonews or CD-Rom Guide as Charlie's 'Im disappointed' review is already hitting forums.
R.I.P. REX (the most banned unbanned member to date ?)