03-11-2011,03:18 PM

Originally Posted by
psnplay
Because of the way the system was designed.
True!
Because people have different tastes and needs and one solution doesn't always work for some and thus they need another.
Are there any big differences between them, beside the GUI and maybe NTFS-Support in one or another? ...and maybe a few use a different sys-call, or whatever...
But in the end,... They all just redirect the file-path...
You should really think harder about what you really want to ask.
Well, maybe I should think harder how to pronounce my questions... (not what I want to ask...)
Your questions are simply way too vague and broad to convey any meaningful discussion. Be more specific, narrow the field a little, perhaps even throw in some examples or your own arguments in an effort to give some fuel for discussion.
That's what I intended with my last 'text-block'. 
In my meaning, Sony themself are the cause for the piracy on PS3.
Wouldn't they have stolen an open-source OS (which they keep closed), there wouldn't be such a fast-groing piracy-scene on there (PS3).
It would have token a lot longer to write a game-loader, if it were a custom OS.
PS2 V7/DMS3 V2 (FW:2.4b7); Seagate Baracuda 200GB
PS2 V7/CC1.0 (FW:34 hacked v2 BM:2.1.6); Maxtor DiamondMAX9 PLUS 160GB
PS2 SCPH-30004R; NoMod+NoLaser
3xSony BBA
3xSony MC 8MB
MAX/Datel 16MB with Boot-CD
MAX/Datel 32MB&64MB
Custom FMCB 1.8b+ Beta-Build, my AIO 0.5, Sony&xRhino-Linux