I need some help with my homework

[FlynMonkeez]

Here are the questions im havin trouble with. If you read Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde please help me with these questions.

1) Revisit chapter 3. Explain Jekyll's arguments now that you know the whole story. Is he in control at that point or not?

2) Once critics argues that Jekyll's fatal flaw is to try to seperate good from evil. Explain what you think goes wrong in Jekyll's experiment.

3)Explain how the concept of conscience affects Dr. Jekyll.

[gokuguy]

Try the forums at www.sparknotes.com and www.gradesaver.com

[SledDog]

Originally posted by FlynMonkeez
Here are the questions im havin trouble with. If you read Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde please help me with these questions.

1) Revisit chapter 3. Explain Jekyll's arguments now that you know the whole story. Is he in control at that point or not?

No. He needs a majority vote in the House of Representatives before that can happen.

2) Once critics argues that Jekyll's fatal flaw is to try to seperate good from evil. Explain what you think goes wrong in Jekyll's experiment.

Too much Tabasco sauce in the serum and Mr. Hyde doesn't get laid by the end of story either...

3)Explain how the concept of conscience affects Dr. Jekyll.

No more so than GW's towards Sadam, as conscience seems to be nothing more than a mere concept to GW too...

[Cpt_Obvious]

Arrrrrrrr, Yer on the right track there Balto but I thinks these answers may help the lad...

Originally posted by FlynMonkeez
Here are the questions im havin trouble with. If you read Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde please help me with these questions.

1) Revisit chapter 3. Explain Jekyll's arguments now that you know the whole story. Is he in control at that point or not?

Jekyll was never in control. It is a known fact that the almight god Loki is in strict control of everybody's actions, so it was Loki that was actually in control as all humans are only mere puppets of the higher authoritites in the heavens.

2) Once critics argues that Jekyll's fatal flaw is to try to seperate good from evil. Explain what you think goes wrong in Jekyll's experiment.

That critic needs to be tarred and feathered! Who the F**k does he think he is trying to impose his ideas and beliefs onto me anyway. I hate those scum bag critics that have nothing better to do than to down talk GREAT movies and books and tell us what trash those types of entertainment are. I totally disagree with any critic that says anything is poor...those are the best things ever! Goldmember was scorned by the critics yet I found it to be the funniest movie ever! Nothing went wrong with Jekyll's experiement in my opinion. I feel that it went perfectly and should be re-created for all of us to enjoy.

3)Explain how the concept of conscience affects Dr. Jekyll.

I refuse to answer this question on the basis that I do not have, nor have I ever had a conscience. If you want conscience, go talk to a priest.

Arrrrrrrr, hope that helps ya lad.

[Primenal]

Originally posted by Balto
3)Explain how the concept of conscience affects Dr. Jekyll.

No more so than GW's towards Sadam, as conscience seems to be nothing more than a mere concept to GW too...

Yea, I gotta agree with that one. It's funny that no matter what happens in the World, George Bush is always saying that it's more important to go for SADDAM first. I don't care if Canada dropped a nuke on us that showed their leaf symbol right on the side of the nuke (Like that would ever happen ). George Bush would still be saying "Let's get Saddam!" It makes me so happy though that the majority of citizens aren't siding with him (still some people who aren't brainwashed by the media ). Fact is though that wether Iraq has nukes or not I think Saddam needs to get out of power (he's not exactly the greatest man in there, but neither is Bush), but I don't think that starting a war with Iraq in which lots of people are going to die is Priority #1. Maybe I don't understand this or something (or somebody can explain it to me), but about those empty nuclear warheads that they found...IF there empty then what the **** is the problem ?

[ThAD0oD]

we launch a nuke? indeed. We have 2 friggin subs..... neither have nukes. barely any tanks or armored vehicles(we have a couple hundred, compared to the US army of over 40,000). Our military is enough to maybe make Luxembourg jealous, but thats about it.......

[FlynMonkeez]

Originally posted by Primenal
It's funny that no matter what happens in the World, George Bush is always saying that it's more important to go for SADDAM first. I

He's racist against muslims, thats why he wants to go after him first. Im not sayin Saddam is a good guy or anything, i agree he needs to go down but bush is racist

[ThAD0oD]

he's a texan, what do you expect

no offence Bgnome

[ian]

Bush is just trying to steal all the oil from Iraq, that's the reason he wants to kill Saddam so much, IMO.

[ThAD0oD]

theres barely any oil in Iraq, its all in Kuwait. Why do you think the Iraqis are pissed?

back when it was a big British colony, they wanted independance. When they achieved independance, the Brits kept what is now called Kuwait, which is where most the resources of the colony was. How would you feel if someone ruled your home, then gave it all back except for your fridge? (a bad analogy, but you get the picture )