Forum: PS3 Technical Development - Topics relating to Playstation 3 Technical development ONLY! Read and discuss the latest Cobra USB updates, tutorials and explanations or find out about bluray drive bypass firmwares plus much more.


The above video goes away if you are a member and logged in, so log in now!




 
Would you like to get all the new info from
PSX-Scene in your email each day?




Want to learn more about the team keeping you up to date with the latest scene news?

Read about them now!

Check out our Developer bios, too!

 


User Tag List

Thread: [Theory] permanent Jailbreak
  

Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 62
  1. #1 [Theory] permanent Jailbreak 
    user is offline account deleted
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    268
    Downloads
    1
    Uploads
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Likes Given
    1
    Likes Received
    33
    now that we can write to dev_flash it will be much easier achieve a permanent jailbreak solution
    congratulations JaiCraB and ps3mrenigma, great work!

    libfreetype seems to be a weak point, because its known for it's vulnerabilities
    I hope somebody manages to patch Lv2 memory using a malformed font file or whatever soon
    Reply With Quote  

  2. #2  
    DevilGun is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    177
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Likes Given
    0
    Likes Received
    1
    We can NOT write to dev_flash
    Reply With Quote  

  3. #3  
    user is offline account deleted
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    268
    Downloads
    1
    Uploads
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Likes Given
    1
    Likes Received
    33
    yes we can
    if you don't believe me read the post of "sk group" at ps3news.
    Reply With Quote  

  4. #4  
    RatAndDragon is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    348
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Likes Given
    0
    Likes Received
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by DevilGun View Post
    We can NOT write to dev_flash
    Check out the current hot news.

    Turns out that by remounting dev_flash under(or adding multiple mount points for it) under a different name, the hypervisor can be worked around as it doesn't prevent writes to the new mount. If I have understood correctly. Which is really bad design....
    Reply With Quote  

  5. #5  
    TnA's Avatar
    TnA
    TnA is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    4,580
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Likes Given
    12
    Likes Received
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by RatAndDragon View Post
    Turns out that by remounting dev_flash under(or adding multiple mount points for it) under a different name, the hypervisor can be worked around as it doesn't prevent writes to the new mount. If I have understood correctly. Which is really bad design....
    Hahaha@Sony.

    Now you see what you get, when you build your software on others (OPEN!) source.
    You simply can't know every part of the source.

    I agree on what I quoted.
    If that's the way how it (the flash 'write-protection') is 'worked around', well done Alejandro Pedro/DAX/M33 and the other person.

    ...and for/to Sony... EPIC FAIL!
    PS2 V7/DMS3 V2 (FW:2.4b7); Seagate Baracuda 200GB
    PS2 V7/CC1.0 (FW:34 hacked v2 BM:2.1.6); Maxtor DiamondMAX9 PLUS 160GB
    PS2 SCPH-30004R; NoMod+NoLaser

    3xSony BBA
    3xSony MC 8MB
    MAX/Datel 16MB with Boot-CD
    MAX/Datel 32MB&64MB

    Custom FMCB 1.8b+ Beta-Build, my AIO 0.5, Sony&xRhino-Linux
    Reply With Quote  

  6. #6  
    TitaniumL's Avatar
    TitaniumL is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    468
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Likes Given
    11
    Likes Received
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by DevilGun View Post
    We can NOT write to dev_flash
    Heh.. So much for your confident "NOT"
    Reply With Quote  

  7. #7  
    chappo is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    92
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Likes Given
    2
    Likes Received
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by DevilGun View Post
    We can NOT write to dev_flash



    Fail....
    Reply With Quote  

  8. #8  
    clik.MEK is offline Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    194
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Likes Given
    11
    Likes Received
    27
    If someone has the patience to answer some of my questions, very appreciated.
    1) you mount dev_flash (1,2 and3?) to another folder (dev_xxx) on the internal hdd. Then you replace those files in dev_xxx and they get loaded, right? how does this open up write access to the firmware-chip? part of the firmware is not on the hdd, right?

    2) kind of follows the first, how is mounting the folders on hdd a permanent solution? sk group confirmed it being permanent, how can that be? the mount point would be reset after reboot, right?

    sorry, i'm kinda lost
    Reply With Quote  

  9. #9  
    user is offline account deleted
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    268
    Downloads
    1
    Uploads
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Likes Given
    1
    Likes Received
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by clik.MEK View Post
    If someone has the patience to answer some of my questions, very appreciated.
    1) you mount dev_flash (1,2 and3?) to another folder (dev_xxx) on the internal hdd. Then you replace those files in dev_xxx and they get loaded, right? how does this open up write access to the firmware-chip? part of the firmware is not on the hdd, right?

    2) kind of follows the first, how is mounting the folders on hdd a permanent solution? sk group confirmed it being permanent, how can that be? the mount point would be reset after reboot, right?

    sorry, i'm kinda lost
    1) you mount dev_flash to dev_Alejandro
    hv blocks write access to dev_flash by checking if "/dev_flash" is part of the destinated path which is named dev_Alejandro now (but its still the same device). so the hv just doesn't care about it

    2) no, but writing to flash is permanent
    Reply With Quote  

  10. #10  
    Pockets69 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Lisbon, Portugal
    Posts
    413
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Likes Given
    19
    Likes Received
    18
    To OP, don't know if that is possible because the exploit, that allows later to inject the payload, requires the usb ports to be triggered, how can you trigger it if you won't connect anything to the machine, you could inject the payload, but with no exploit the payload won't work if you know what i mean.

    Although i heard somewhere that someone was working on it, can't remember where it was about 3 weeks ago if i am not mistaken.
    Reply With Quote  

Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •